News
Crime
- [11/26] Vick pleads guilty to state dogfighting charge
- [11/25] Reports: McNamee gave DNA samples to investigators
- [11/25] Ex-Mets OF Dykstra settles accounting firm lawsuit
Litigation
- [12/01] ND farmer defies government by draining wetlands
- [12/01] Court: Swiss can hand over bank files in BAE probe
- [12/01] High court declines pathologist Wecht's appeal
White Collar Crime
- [12/01] Swiss court imprisons ex-manager of Israeli bank
- [12/01] Feds arrest Birmingham Mayor on bribery charges
- [12/01] High court declines pathologist Wecht's appeal
Case Summaries
Criminal Law & Procedure
[12/01]
Ballard v. Heineman
In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action alleging plaintiff was the victim of defendant-state trooper's racially-motivated traffic stop and subsequent unconstitutional search and seizure, which defendants-officials promoted through policies that encouraged the targeting of racial minorities, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff created no genuine issues of material fact challenging unopposed statements of fact showing no constitutional violations occurred as a matter of law; and 2) the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying further discovery.
[12/01]
US v. Street
A conviction for aiding and abetting the intentional killing of an individual in furtherance of a drug trafficking offense is reversed and remanded for a new trial where: 1) it was an abuse of discretion to deny defendant's motion for a mistrial following testimony by a government witness that defendant had admitted failing a polygraph examination; 2) it was reversible error to allow extensive testimony on the violent, lawless tendencies of a particular motorcycle gang; and 3) neither error alone, and certainly not the two in combination, could be considered harmless.
[12/01]
US v. Stierhoff
Conviction and sentence for four counts of income tax evasion are affirmed over claims that the district court failed to: 1) suppress evidence; 2) recognize the government's duty to prove that defendant was a person subject to the tax code; 3) grant judgment of acquittal premised upon evidentiary insufficiency; 4) cabin the use of a summary witness; and 5) limit its sentencing calculus to facts found by the jury.
Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.



